Shoe Concealment and Interdisciplinarity at TAG

TAG.png

If anyone is going to be at the Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG) conference in Bradford next week, you might be interested in the session: ‘Blurring the Boundaries: Interdisciplinary perspectives on archaeology’, organised by Sarah Morton and Stephen O’Brien, to be held on the morning of Wednesday 16th December (programme here). I’ll be giving a paper entitled: ‘If the (concealed) shoe fits: The logical pairing of archaeology and folklore’, and will be talking about – as you might have guessed – shoe concealment.

The line-up for the session looks fantastic, with speakers hailing from a wide range of disciplines:

Artur Ribeiro: ‘Philosophy and archaeology: an underrated relation’

Owen Hatherley: ‘Reconstruction and Stalinism: historical fakery, populism and capital in the Soviet Bloc’

Marie Fox: ‘Automating causal explanations of observed features using temporal planning’

Torgrim Guttormsen: The idea of the carnivalesque: a theoretical approach for public archaeology?

Phillip Tonner: Reflections on a thesis: the dwelling perspective: Heidegger, archaeology and the Palaeolithic origins of human mortality’

David Jennings: ‘The Manchester’s Improving Daily Project: re-interpreting the Manchester ballads using archaeology and reggae’

Natalie Zhuravska: ‘Text and matter intertwined: testing interdisciplinarity on the case of inscribed stirrup jars’

Jamie Cameron et al.: ‘Challenges and opportunities in the interdisciplinary study of religious relics’

The abstract for my paper reads: “If I had to label myself – and academic trend suggests that I do – I would employ the term ‘folklore archaeologist’. This is an innocuous enough pairing with a simple meaning: basically, I study folkloric beliefs and customs through their material manifestations. Yet this term has been met with blank looks and raised eyebrows, with more than a few fellow archaeologists advising me against employment of the word ‘folklore’, which appears to have become an academic taboo in some disciplines.

However, such a pairing is far from unreasonable. While ‘folklore archaeology’ may not be an officially recognised academic title, the two subjects have a long history of affiliation, and it is the purpose of this paper to demonstrate the value – indeed, the logic – of employing methodologies from both folklore and archaeology in elucidating the material manifestations of popular beliefs. Arguments and theories will be drawn from my own experiences researching the post-medieval custom of shoe concealment, whereby shoes were enigmatically employed as domestic apotropaic devices.”

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s